Jamie O’Neill is not a typical teenager. He likes the rain and the works of Edgar Allan Poe. He likes to watch videos of lectures delivered by famous mathematicians, and knows the exact number of steps between his house and his school. He’s more than a little pre-occupied by the idea of building a perpetual motion machine because, for reasons only clear to Jamie, he thinks it will allow him to go back in time and meet his mother, who died shortly after giving birth to him. Unsurprisingly, Jamie doesn’t fit in at school. Classmates bully him. The headteacher has no time for misfits and outliers like Jamie, preferring boys with more conventional ambitions and more predictable behaviors.

Fortunately for Jamie, he has a loving father and grandmother, and he attracts the attention of two caring teachers, both of whom have complex lives and pasts of their own. One of them is Tadhg Foley, a woodwork teacher, who encourages Jamie to help him build a currach, a traditional Irish boat.

Elaine Feeney’s second novel could easily have ended up as sentimental and cloying. It doesn’t, largely because she portrays so compassionately how difficult it is to be Jamie. Nevertheless, she isn’t able to avoid entirely the traps she builds for herself. Much of the story’s setup is predictable, and not all the characters come alive from the page. Not everyone fits neatly into the slots the world makes for them, and many need care and affection to find their way. Parenting, and especially the consequences of its absence, is Feeney’s theme and it’s one she studies with a compassionate eye.

It tells us, I suppose, how hot a property Claire Keegan is these days that her UK publisher, Faber & Faber, is able to package and publish one of her short stories as a hardback book for £8.99. Commercial opportunism for sure, but it’s hard to complain when the story is as exquisite as So Late in the Day.

Not a single word is wasted in this poignant tale. Cathal faces an evening alone and time to reflect on what he might have had with Sabine if only he had been more generous. So much pain, bitterness, and loss is compressed into a few pages, reminding readers yet again what mastery Claire Keegan has over the short story. Her work recalls that of William Trevor, and for me there’s no higher praise than that.

Having enjoyed Maggie O’Farrell’s previous novel (Hamnet), The Marriage Portrait was a big disappointment. Set in 16th century Italy, it tells the story of Lucrezia de Medici and her betrothal at a young age to the Duke of Ferrara. The union of two aristocratic families is the intention, and Lucrezia’s role is clear: the production of a male heir.

The Marriage Portrait is overlong and overwritten. I found I had no interest in the fate of Lucrezia or the machinations of her cruel husband. I can’t recall when I last looked forward so much to a book from such a gifted novelist and ended up so disappointed.

I finished this biography of George Eliot appreciating for the first time how courageous and brilliant she was. I had loved several of her novels (Middlemarch, Silas Marner, The Mill on The Floss) when I was a student, but I knew almost nothing of her life until I read Clare Carlisle’s book, The Marriage Question.

In 1854, Marian Evans (as she was then) took the decision to elope with a married man, George Henry Lewes. It is hard, nearly two centuries later, to understand how much scandal and rejection her commitment to Lewes provoked. She was for a time ostracized by family, friends, and “polite society”, and only the celebrity that came with the success of her writing in the 1860s helped to mitigate some of the effects of her “marriage” to Lewes.

Claire Carlisle is an academic and philosopher, and is particularly good at explaining Eliot’s intellectual development and the influence that philosophers such as Hegel and Spinoza had on her thinking and work. Carlisle’s insistence that ideas about “marriage” are the key to understanding Eliot’s novels is, in my view, overstated, but she is a sensitive reader of the key works. I recommend this book without reservation, but it will appeal most to those who know and love the Eliot canon.

Sigh and Bell, along with their two dogs, decide to rent a dilapidated, old farmhouse deep in the Irish countryside. Its remoteness is a big part of the appeal because Sigh and Bell have chosen to have as little contact as possible with other people. No contact with family, no contact with friends, no contact with anyone except the occasional and unavoidable encounter with the neighboring farmer. Sigh and Bell don’t do much. They walk to the local beach, swim in the sea, and make a trip when necessary to the local shop to buy essentials.

Sigh and Bell are just two creatures passing through the house and the landscape. They make a conscious and determined effort not to impose themselves on the teeming life around them. Birds, insects, fish, dogs, and cows share the world, taking the space and everything else they need to survive. And watching over everything is the mountain, the mountain directly behind the house, the mountain that they don’t climb until eight years have passed.

With so little information, the reader’s imagination tries to fill the gaps. Are Sigh and Bell eco-warriors or hippies turning their backs on the modern world? Are they hiding from some terrible trauma in their past? Are they two individuals striving to merge and live a single life? Hints are provided, but they are fleeting and oblique.

Seven Steeples is an unconventional, demanding, daring, and puzzling book. It’s as much a prose poem as it is a novel, rich in language and rhythm. It’s not a book one closes and forgets. It lingers. It tunnels into one’s imagination, leaving images of decay, decline, and transience.

What exactly is Kettle’s Yard? Is it a museum or a private home preserved for future generations? Both, I suppose. But it’s clear from the indelible impression it leaves on so many visitors that it acts in some mysterious way like no other museum or home, that for many it represents a different way to live, a way to put art and beauty at the center of life.

I’m not sure when I made my first visit. Most likely it would have been 1995 when I moved to Cambridge. I may have forgotten the date but the impact Kettle’s Yard made that day never left me. It seemed to me to be the perfect place to live. I suppose the art in the house was bound to make an impression because I had loved the work of David Jones, Barbara Hepworth, Henri Gaudier-Brezska and Ben Nicholson long before the visit. But it was more than that. And it was more than the pared back elegance of the house or the tasteful arrangement of everything. It was something to do with harmony and the determination you find in every part of the house to express a vision that art belongs in our domestic surroundings, not just in galleries and museums.

The house was the creation of Jim Ede. Ede didn’t achieve very much in conventional career terms. His great talent was for friendship and for supporting the artists whose work he loved. His patronage of the likes of Alfred Wallis, David Jones, and many others was fundamental to their careers and reputations. He had a special eye for bringing together and arranging artworks to create unique spaces. Kettle’s Yard was the ultimate expression of that gift, though it opened relatively late in Ede’s life.

Ede comes alive in all his complexity in Laura Freeman’s wonderful and beautifully illustrated biography. It will delight anyone who has visited and loved Kettle’s Yard. I hope it drives many more who have never seen the house to visit for the first time.

My goals had been limited. A visit to Hauser & Wirth’s gallery, followed by lunch, and then on to Wells and its lovely cathedral. But Bruton proved to be a little gem, so we lingered longer than planned. The exhibition at Hauser & Wirth’s Somerset outpost at Durslade Farm (GRUPPENAUSSTELLUNG) was wacky, funny, and thought-provoking, and the site itself pretty and picturesque. Heading into the small town center, we parked close to St. Mary’s church just as its bell was tolling for the Sunday morning service. Pevsner calls St. Mary’s “one of the proudest churches of East Somerset”, and I know what he means. It occupies a prominent position overlooking the river and is clearly the focal point of the town. I explored the interior once the service had ended. Although its 14th century core has been much added to over hundreds of years, it presents as a harmonious and satisfying whole.

The main streets of Bruton are as pretty as can be, conforming to most people’s image of what a small, ancient, English town should look like. It’s clearly prosperous and enjoying its reinvention as a destination for art connoisseurs and food lovers. We had made a lunch reservation in advance at Osip, and what an inspired choice that proved to be. Outstanding food and service – not to be missed if you find yourself in this part of Somerset. Another stroll after lunch around the lovely, quiet streets, and then off to Wells as planned. A special day in a really charming town.

John Healy and I grew up in the same London neighborhood. We attended the same elementary school. He is nearly twenty years older than me, and during my childhood years he would have been living rough on the streets and in the parks near where I lived. He would have been one of the “winos”, “down-and-outs”, or “tramps” that my parents warned me to avoid on my way to and from school, part of that frightening underclass we saw all the time, begging, fighting, passed out in doorways.

The Grass Arena is the story of Healy’s early years, but mostly of the long period he spent as a chronic and homeless alcoholic. It is a terrible tale, one filled with violence, cruelty, and misery. But this is no self-pitying “misery memoir”. To find its stylistic antecedent you have to go to a work like Orwell’s Down and Out in Paris and London – part autobiography, part reportage, part social criticism.

Unlike the lives of thousands of others like him, Healy’s life didn’t end in tragedy. During one of his many short stays in prison, Healy discovered chess. It gripped his imagination and gave him the strength to relinquish alcohol. He mastered the game and along the way found the words to tell his story. And what an unforgettable story it is.

In the hands of its best practitioners the spy novel has always been a vehicle for exploring themes such as betrayal, disillusionment, and regret. Throw in atonement and the possibility of redemption and you have David Park’s short and engaging novel Spies in Canaan. Set mostly in Vietnam in the final days of America’s horror-filled engagement there, it tells the tale of an innocent, junior data analyst who gets pulled from his routine translation work into something altogether more murky and complex by a CIA officer. The corruption of innocence, the slow dissolution of ideals, and the effort to live a good life in spite of it all – those are Park’s preoccupations in this atmospheric and memorable story.

The result was no surprise. I doubt there is a better team in the world right now than Manchester City, and the team that I have supported since I was 8 years old, though somewhat improved in the past year, was never going to be a serious obstacle on City’s road to securing the Treble. And so it proved to be. We were beaten 2-1 by a much better team and, quite frankly, the scoreline flattered us. The gulf in quality between the old rivals was there for everyone to see.

But it was a great day nonetheless. My first ever F.A. Cup final. The first time these two teams had ever met in the final. Only my second visit to Wembley Stadium. A wonderful spectacle in early summer sunshine enjoyed by two sets of the most partisan fans you could ever hope to meet. I felt very fortunate to be there, and even the disappointing result could not change that.